"It is time no longer to praise the Seagram Building, but to bury it" [comparison of the energy profile of Mies van der Rohe’s iconic Seagram Building with Waugh Thistleton’s 6 Orsman Road]

Urban, Florian; Calder, Barnabas

"It is time no longer to praise the Seagram Building, but to bury it" [comparison of the energy profile of Mies van der Rohe’s iconic Seagram Building with Waugh Thistleton’s 6 Orsman Road]

Output Details

Urban, Florian and Calder, Barnabas (2022) "It is time no longer to praise the Seagram Building, but to bury it" [comparison of the energy profile of Mies van der Rohe’s iconic Seagram Building with Waugh Thistleton’s 6 Orsman Road]. Architects Journal, 249 (108). ISSN 0003-8466
[Article]

Further Details
Staff Profiles

[A][B][+][-]

Further Details

Creators/Authors:

Urban, Florian and Calder, Barnabas

Abstract:

A comparison between the Seagram Building in New York (1958, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe) and 6 Orsman Road in London (2020, Waugh Thistleton) with regard to their energy use.

Official URL:

https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/buildings/it-is-time-no-longer-to-praise-the-seagram-building-but-to-bury-it

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Seagram, Mies van der Rohe, Energy, Orsman Road, Waugh Thistleton, Operational Energy, Embodied Energy

School/Academic Area:

Mackintosh School of Architecture > History of Architecture & Urban Studies (HAUS)

Dates:

Date

Date Type

10 November 2022

Published

9 November 2022